Best Of
Re: Dilemma reward change?
STT Community wrote: »ChaosChild wrote: »STT Community wrote: »ChaosChild wrote: »STT Community wrote: »ChaosChild wrote: »But still worse than just giving us the purple crew that the rations were originally replacing. They ask us for feedback, they ignore that feedback, then they do what they were going to do anyway. What is the point of any of it?
@STT Community I guess you're not going to respond to this either, since you never did respond to that feedback no matter how often you were prompted?
Greetings Captain, as others have mentioned a scout from previous months suggested that Honor would be a good Dilemma reward. But we can contact the team in order to offer a possible suggestion for a SR Behold. Thoughts? LLAP
Please, please, please go back to that thread where we suggested that. You'll see numerous follow-up comments regarding how the original question was badly worded, how honor was the best reward from the selected options but still not a good option. You'll also see questions that we asked you directly, that you never bothered to answer.
Don't ignore our feedback, then attempt to cite that same feedback as a justification for your continued mistakes.
Honestly, bringing up that thread at this point is just unmitigated gall.
Greetings Captains,
While the forums is a great source of Feedback, is not the only source where we gather feedback from rest assured. We're always aiming to keep improving your game experience through mechanics, features and rewards. Yesterday we passed notes to the team regarding the petition to go back to old rewards. LLAP
I notice that you STILL haven't answered any of the questions we asked you.
How can we help you? We can't answer quick questions such as "How much honor" or specific amounts of rewards since that decision comes from our Product Team. All our notes are always welcome for game changes. Let us know in here which questions you want answer for and we will try our best. LLAP
Ok. Let me try to be clear. There are certain dilemmas on voyages that normally drop 100 honor, 75 chronitons, and a 4* crew. They have a small chance of that being a 4* behold now or the 5* voyage exclusive.
Sometimes that dilemma would drop replicator rations which are much worse than the standard 100 honor/75 chrons/4* crew.
The initial request was to stop dropping the rations and always do the 100 honor/75 chrons/4* crew.
You posted, "what would you like instead of rations would you like honor?"
Everyone responded, that depends how much honor. The original dilemma is worth 100 honor + 200 honor(from airlocking the 4*) with the chance of getting a new 4* or the 5*. We can't answer if we would like honor without you telling us if it's 100 honor, or 1000 honor. 1000 honor is a good reward. 100 honor is still less than the normal dilemma.
The game now made a change. People are asking, what is the change. How much honor exactly is in the reward. Is there still the chance of the 4 or 5* behold? That is not a decision that hasn't been made and you don't know the answer. That is a decision that has been made and is currently implemented in the code. What people are asking you to do is go to the Product Team and ask them, "what is the new reward" and then report back with that answer.
And the fact that you are acting shocked at people asking these questions, when they have been asked repeatedly on the old thread does not inspire confidence that you read the old thread and forwarded that feedback to the team.
Let me give you a real world example. You have a bottle of soda, you ask people, would you like the soda or money. Everyone responds, that depends, if you're offering $10 we would like the money, but if you're only offering 50 cents then no, that's not good. 3 months later you come and say, "you're now getting money". Everyone says "how much money are you giving". And you respond, I'm surprised to hear this new feedback, I will send it to the team, this is the first we're hearing about it. And everyone says, we told you all of this 3 months ago and you still haven't answered or shown you even understand our question.

10
Re: Dilemma reward change?
STT Community wrote: »ChaosChild wrote: »STT Community wrote: »ChaosChild wrote: »STT Community wrote: »ChaosChild wrote: »But still worse than just giving us the purple crew that the rations were originally replacing. They ask us for feedback, they ignore that feedback, then they do what they were going to do anyway. What is the point of any of it?
@STT Community I guess you're not going to respond to this either, since you never did respond to that feedback no matter how often you were prompted?
Greetings Captain, as others have mentioned a scout from previous months suggested that Honor would be a good Dilemma reward. But we can contact the team in order to offer a possible suggestion for a SR Behold. Thoughts? LLAP
Please, please, please go back to that thread where we suggested that. You'll see numerous follow-up comments regarding how the original question was badly worded, how honor was the best reward from the selected options but still not a good option. You'll also see questions that we asked you directly, that you never bothered to answer.
Don't ignore our feedback, then attempt to cite that same feedback as a justification for your continued mistakes.
Honestly, bringing up that thread at this point is just unmitigated gall.
Greetings Captains,
While the forums is a great source of Feedback, is not the only source where we gather feedback from rest assured. We're always aiming to keep improving your game experience through mechanics, features and rewards. Yesterday we passed notes to the team regarding the petition to go back to old rewards. LLAP
I notice that you STILL haven't answered any of the questions we asked you.
How can we help you? We can't answer quick questions such as "How much honor" or specific amounts of rewards since that decision comes from our Product Team. All our notes are always welcome for game changes. Let us know in here which questions you want answer for and we will try our best. LLAP
But the questions being asked are about a change that has already been made and implemented, without any communication to players about the specific details. We're just seeking clarity on something that is already in the game.
Re: Dilemma reward change?
STT Community wrote: »ChaosChild wrote: »STT Community wrote: »ChaosChild wrote: »But still worse than just giving us the purple crew that the rations were originally replacing. They ask us for feedback, they ignore that feedback, then they do what they were going to do anyway. What is the point of any of it?
@STT Community I guess you're not going to respond to this either, since you never did respond to that feedback no matter how often you were prompted?
Greetings Captain, as others have mentioned a scout from previous months suggested that Honor would be a good Dilemma reward. But we can contact the team in order to offer a possible suggestion for a SR Behold. Thoughts? LLAP
Please, please, please go back to that thread where we suggested that. You'll see numerous follow-up comments regarding how the original question was badly worded, how honor was the best reward from the selected options but still not a good option. You'll also see questions that we asked you directly, that you never bothered to answer.
Don't ignore our feedback, then attempt to cite that same feedback as a justification for your continued mistakes.
Honestly, bringing up that thread at this point is just unmitigated gall.
Greetings Captains,
While the forums is a great source of Feedback, is not the only source where we gather feedback from rest assured. We're always aiming to keep improving your game experience through mechanics, features and rewards. Yesterday we passed notes to the team regarding the petition to go back to old rewards. LLAP
I notice that you STILL haven't answered any of the questions we asked you.
Re: Dilemma reward change?
DavideBooks wrote: »I notice that the powers that be are silent on responding to legitimate questions. That is disappointing. It does not inspire trust.
Unfortunately, this has been a recurring theme lately. And as you very aptly said, it does not inspire trust.
DavideBooks wrote: »Therefore, as I promised, I have ended my boycott of purchases and bought a monthly pass. I would consider more, but there are still unanswered questions.
I too have been boycotting purchases. I used to spend quite a fair bit. More than I'd like to admit to be honest, although I'm sure far less than a lot of the whales.
I'm not yet at a point where that will change any time soon. The trust is simply not there.

2
Re: Mega Event Discussion: Interstellar Irreverence
We have a full skirmish this week, so I can forgive just a half skirmish for this mega. But that's a lot of tedious button bashing for all those galaxies.
Re: Dilemma reward change?
I notice that the powers that be are silent on responding to legitimate questions. That is disappointing. It does not inspire trust.
Please confirm how much honor. Please confirm if the other rewards are still there. Please confirm if the odds have changed.
For the record, I am underwhelmed that the new reward is still worse than the reward it is inexplicably replacing. I have no idea why they insist on filler rather than crew. It is mind boggling.
Also for the record, I appreciate that there is some change, even if it is uninspiring and uninspired. I appreciate that it is a vast improvement over the useless replicator rations.
Therefore, as I promised, I have ended my boycott of purchases and bought a monthly pass. I would consider more, but there are still unanswered questions.
Please confirm how much honor. Please confirm if the other rewards are still there. Please confirm if the odds have changed.
For the record, I am underwhelmed that the new reward is still worse than the reward it is inexplicably replacing. I have no idea why they insist on filler rather than crew. It is mind boggling.
Also for the record, I appreciate that there is some change, even if it is uninspiring and uninspired. I appreciate that it is a vast improvement over the useless replicator rations.
Therefore, as I promised, I have ended my boycott of purchases and bought a monthly pass. I would consider more, but there are still unanswered questions.
Re: Do Not Airlock Checklist Thread 4
New Version Released 6.27.
In addition to the listed changes, I made a couple of tweaks to the import logic. I've looked at the Datacore logic compared to other sources, and I think what we are seeing on datacore is accurate. They have just cleaned everything up and updated it with all the changes, etc. This did causes significant changes to rankings between 6.25 and 6.26. It seems to be a combination of the version upgrade on datacore and the mass addition of new tiers of collections that impacted crew ratings/stats. I am still doing some comparisons with Datacore and the other sources as I do have a few crew that look out of line but I'm trying to see if that is the case or not. And to be honest it is really just a ton of spot checking when looking for anomalies in the data sets.
IF anyone has some time and wants to help please let me know and I can give you details on what I am looking at as I could use some additional sets of eyes.
"Changed Datacore download link to link to main page and added note in the instructions above about how to access the CSV download.
Added New Crew: Emotionally Heightened T'Lyn, Worst Contact Riker, Displaced Elnor, Displaced Mariner, Out of Time Burnham, Captain Rayner
Added New Series: Short Treks (only Worst Contact Riker, but I anticipate that several existing crew will migrate to this series via hidden trait changes/additions.)
Added New Collection - No Rules"
In addition to the listed changes, I made a couple of tweaks to the import logic. I've looked at the Datacore logic compared to other sources, and I think what we are seeing on datacore is accurate. They have just cleaned everything up and updated it with all the changes, etc. This did causes significant changes to rankings between 6.25 and 6.26. It seems to be a combination of the version upgrade on datacore and the mass addition of new tiers of collections that impacted crew ratings/stats. I am still doing some comparisons with Datacore and the other sources as I do have a few crew that look out of line but I'm trying to see if that is the case or not. And to be honest it is really just a ton of spot checking when looking for anomalies in the data sets.
IF anyone has some time and wants to help please let me know and I can give you details on what I am looking at as I could use some additional sets of eyes.
"Changed Datacore download link to link to main page and added note in the instructions above about how to access the CSV download.
Added New Crew: Emotionally Heightened T'Lyn, Worst Contact Riker, Displaced Elnor, Displaced Mariner, Out of Time Burnham, Captain Rayner
Added New Series: Short Treks (only Worst Contact Riker, but I anticipate that several existing crew will migrate to this series via hidden trait changes/additions.)
Added New Collection - No Rules"

3
Re: Mega Event Discussion: Interstellar Irreverence
A couple crew names in the announcement are incorrect.
While I like that we'll get FF new 4* crew in 3 of the 4 events, it certainly seems heavy on galaxy. It's also a shame that the only skirmish is a hybrid.
- Ron Docent = Lt. Commander Ron Docent
- Jen Shre'yan = Ensign Jennifer Sh'reyan
While I like that we'll get FF new 4* crew in 3 of the 4 events, it certainly seems heavy on galaxy. It's also a shame that the only skirmish is a hybrid.
Re: Player Positivity and Accomplishment Thread
Got van Gelder in a Voyage Behold at the 8 hour mark this morning - my first since late December (when I had Grady as an option and chose him):


In a separate issue, I still do not have Chakotay. Maybe another time, lol.


In a separate issue, I still do not have Chakotay. Maybe another time, lol.