Don't get this way of thinking "Let's add something new instead of squashing old bugs first"...
You must have never worked in software.
New features are sexy, reworking old stuff is the opposite.
Three companies ago, it took me a lot of coaxing to get an engineer's time to fix identified bugs.
Don't get this way of thinking "Let's add something new instead of squashing old bugs first"...
You must have never worked in software.
New features are sexy, reworking old stuff is the opposite.
Three companies ago, it took me a lot of coaxing to get an engineer's time to fix identified bugs.
Hopefully the person complaining about bgs has been reporting them in the ENGINEERING Section
"The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself."
Don't get this way of thinking "Let's add something new instead of squashing old bugs first"...
You must have never worked in software.
New features are sexy, reworking old stuff is the opposite.
Three companies ago, it took me a lot of coaxing to get an engineer's time to fix identified bugs.
I wrote few applications of my own. I have never added another functionality until all known problems were resolved.
Don't get this way of thinking "Let's add something new instead of squashing old bugs first"...
You must have never worked in software.
New features are sexy, reworking old stuff is the opposite.
Three companies ago, it took me a lot of coaxing to get an engineer's time to fix identified bugs.
I wrote few applications of my own. I have never added another functionality until all known problems were resolved.
I can just imagine either Microsoft being out of business or us all still running Windows ME (or 95 or an earlier version) if they followed this advice.
We'd also not have voyages, collections, or skirmishes if DB listed to this.
Don't get this way of thinking "Let's add something new instead of squashing old bugs first"...
You must have never worked in software.
New features are sexy, reworking old stuff is the opposite.
Three companies ago, it took me a lot of coaxing to get an engineer's time to fix identified bugs.
I wrote few applications of my own. I have never added another functionality until all known problems were resolved.
I can just imagine either Microsoft being out of business or us all still running Windows ME (or 95 or an earlier version) if they followed this advice.
We'd also not have voyages, collections, or skirmishes if DB listed to this.
I was using applications written to replace pencil and paper working methods. They were so painful to use people simply ignored them and wrote their own or returned to pencil and paper.
Don't get this way of thinking "Let's add something new instead of squashing old bugs first"...
You must have never worked in software.
New features are sexy, reworking old stuff is the opposite.
Three companies ago, it took me a lot of coaxing to get an engineer's time to fix identified bugs.
I wrote few applications of my own. I have never added another functionality until all known problems were resolved.
I can just imagine either Microsoft being out of business or us all still running Windows ME (or 95 or an earlier version) if they followed this advice.
We'd also not have voyages, collections, or skirmishes if DB listed to this.
So you are willing to pay money to replace an os that never worked properly. That new OS you paid for will never work properly but again you can pay more money to get a new OS that nobody wanted but the company that made the OS wants to try to sell there phones that use that OS.
Don't get this way of thinking "Let's add something new instead of squashing old bugs first"...
You must have never worked in software.
New features are sexy, reworking old stuff is the opposite.
Three companies ago, it took me a lot of coaxing to get an engineer's time to fix identified bugs.
I wrote few applications of my own. I have never added another functionality until all known problems were resolved.
I can just imagine either Microsoft being out of business or us all still running Windows ME (or 95 or an earlier version) if they followed this advice.
We'd also not have voyages, collections, or skirmishes if DB listed to this.
So you are willing to pay money to replace an os that never worked properly. That new OS you paid for will never work properly but again you can pay more money to get a new OS that nobody wanted but the company that made the OS wants to try to sell there phones that use that OS.
and yet it is one of the most valuable companies in the world .... go figure
Don't get this way of thinking "Let's add something new instead of squashing old bugs first"...
You must have never worked in software.
New features are sexy, reworking old stuff is the opposite.
Three companies ago, it took me a lot of coaxing to get an engineer's time to fix identified bugs.
I wrote few applications of my own. I have never added another functionality until all known problems were resolved.
I can just imagine either Microsoft being out of business or us all still running Windows ME (or 95 or an earlier version) if they followed this advice.
We'd also not have voyages, collections, or skirmishes if DB listed to this.
So you are willing to pay money to replace an os that never worked properly. That new OS you paid for will never work properly but again you can pay more money to get a new OS that nobody wanted but the company that made the OS wants to try to sell there phones that use that OS.
and yet it is one of the most valuable companies in the world .... go figure
Comments
If either is true please can we get the Enterprise E, or at a push an assimilated Voyager...
PM for details.
So long and thanks for all the fish.
Existing Planet? New Planet?
Ooooh. The transwarp hub-thingie would be awesome.
They could call it the "Terran Empire Faction".
Yeah it would!!!!!!!!!
The KCA is Mirror Universe too. Although DB could add a Terran Rebellion faction I suppose.
It might be Mirror Universe, but the new Faction is clearly going to be Borg.
I'm aware. I was just going off of Hungry Dog's post. It does make me wonder what a 16th faction would be if DB keep adding them.
Kazon! Kazon!
(sorry, couldn't resist)
Kyrian Lives Matter
What specific bugs have you come across, and have you reported them in the Engineering Section?
You must have never worked in software.
New features are sexy, reworking old stuff is the opposite.
Three companies ago, it took me a lot of coaxing to get an engineer's time to fix identified bugs.
Hopefully the person complaining about bgs has been reporting them in the ENGINEERING Section
You can't assign specialists to build certain items in current phase of event. Yes, this bug is reported in Engineering Section.
I wrote few applications of my own. I have never added another functionality until all known problems were resolved.
I can just imagine either Microsoft being out of business or us all still running Windows ME (or 95 or an earlier version) if they followed this advice.
We'd also not have voyages, collections, or skirmishes if DB listed to this.
I was using applications written to replace pencil and paper working methods. They were so painful to use people simply ignored them and wrote their own or returned to pencil and paper.
Haven't run into that problem. Must not have gphit the right ones.
But, I doubt Borg Fraction is going to go live over the weekend.
So you are willing to pay money to replace an os that never worked properly. That new OS you paid for will never work properly but again you can pay more money to get a new OS that nobody wanted but the company that made the OS wants to try to sell there phones that use that OS.
and yet it is one of the most valuable companies in the world .... go figure
You got that right😉