Home The Bridge

#1 Bulldog Avatar?

I've seen multiple people in Universe Chat with this avatar. How do you acquire this? Anyone know?
khlb2z1yzkhi.png

Comments

  • StephLovesVoyagerStephLovesVoyager ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hi @Xipetotecc [TRCM], there was a thread about this same topic not long ago, not sure that the question was answered though:

    https://forum.disruptorbeam.com/stt/discussion/17787/1-avatar-and-where-to-get-him
    Going boldly since April 2020 | My Datacore profile
  • (HGH)Apollo(HGH)Apollo ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes I saw a person in UC with it too. My guess is that it is the sixth year avatar that somehow got into the game early.
    Let’s fly!
  • AviTrekAviTrek ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes I saw a person in UC with it too. My guess is that it is the sixth year avatar that somehow got into the game early.

    I doubt the 6th year avatar has even been drawn yet. But it may be an avatar created for another purpose or a possibility for 5th year that was abandoned that leaked in via some bug.
  • Ban them!
  • Ishmael MarxIshmael Marx ✭✭✭✭✭
    My guess... it's Ben. Only a WRG employee would have access to an otherwise unavailable avatar, right?

    Obviously I'm just making this up. Or am I?
  • MiT SanoaMiT Sanoa ✭✭✭✭✭
    My guess... it's Ben. Only a WRG employee would have access to an otherwise unavailable avatar, right?

    Obviously I'm just making this up. Or am I?

    In Eternal the devs have their own card backs. So why not?
    Wir, die Mirror Tribbles [MiT] haben freie Plätze zu vergeben. Kein Zwang und kein Stress, dafür aber Spaß, Discord und eine nette, hilfsbereite Gemeinschaft, incl. voll ausgebauter Starbase und täglich 700 ISM.
  • My guess... it's Ben. Only a WRG employee would have access to an otherwise unavailable avatar, right?

    Obviously I'm just making this up. Or am I?

    It's not Ben.
  • pretty sure i’ve seen more than just one player with it before
    “What's a knockout like you doing in a computer-generated gin joint like this?”

    Proud member of Patterns of Force
    Captain Level 99
    Played since January 2017

    TP: Do better!!!
  • 09i2m6gtjexr.png

    you cannot hide
  • Xipetotecc [TRCM]Xipetotecc [TRCM] ✭✭✭
    edited March 2021
    CS says they have no information about the avatar and are "investigating" the bug. We all know what that means. -_-
  • I get the avatar now for free? :)
  • I get the avatar now for free? :)

    Anyone choosing No.1 as their avatar will be banned for 6 events, for clicking on an available tab that other players didn't take advantage of.
  • Princess TristaPrincess Trista ✭✭✭✭✭
    I get the avatar now for free? :)

    brATT, you will have to pay for it. But then you already knew that ;)

    <3<3<3
  • Such a fuss over a ***** in game avatar
    (that has zero impact on the game). 🙄😆

    An official reply from TP would be appropiate though. :)

    @Shan any chance of TP addressing this issue please? The No.1 artwork appears on many lower Captains Avatar. How are they receiving the Avatar?
  • BarnBurnerBarnBurner ✭✭✭✭
    AviTrek wrote: »
    Such a fuss over a ***** in game avatar
    (that has zero impact on the game). 🙄😆

    An official reply from TP would be appropiate though. :)

    @Shan any chance of TP addressing this issue please? The No.1 artwork appears on many lower Captains Avatar. How are they receiving the Avatar?

    The number of real consequential bugs/features that they can worry about, and people continue to ask/care about avatars? I guess stuck voyages isn't a concern anymore and neither are new event types, just as long as as some lower ranked players don't get to use an avatar that was never introduced.

    Comments like these do nothing to resolve anything. Mostly, comments like these prove that the fanboys/fangirls/fanpeople are the most toxic people on these forums. Even the positivity threads owner got all twisted when a couple of people were clarifying some points about voyage skill checkpoints. Power trip much? Gotta LOL at these folks that feel compelled to control the statements and words of others, and then claim that they are not trying to stifle criticism.

    Apparently, solid advice and criticism are too “negative” for the positivity crew. But, positivity crew is probably too positive of a name for them.
  • IceCatIceCat ✭✭✭✭✭
    IceCat wrote: »
    Can we please keep this thread on track? This is not why I started it and I hope people can respect that.
    BarnBurner wrote: »
    IceCat wrote: »
    Can we please keep this thread on track? This is not why I started it and I hope people can respect that.

    You serious? Still seems pretty positive to me. Just some clarification on skill checks

    Just for context, that was literally all I said. People were starting to get off topic, and I simply wanted to keep the thread on point. Everyone else was fine with this. Except apparently you, @BarnBurner.
    BarnBurner wrote: »
    AviTrek wrote: »
    Such a fuss over a ***** in game avatar
    (that has zero impact on the game). 🙄😆

    An official reply from TP would be appropiate though. :)

    @Shan any chance of TP addressing this issue please? The No.1 artwork appears on many lower Captains Avatar. How are they receiving the Avatar?

    The number of real consequential bugs/features that they can worry about, and people continue to ask/care about avatars? I guess stuck voyages isn't a concern anymore and neither are new event types, just as long as as some lower ranked players don't get to use an avatar that was never introduced.

    Comments like these do nothing to resolve anything. Mostly, comments like these prove that the fanboys/fangirls/fanpeople are the most toxic people on these forums. Even the positivity threads owner got all twisted when a couple of people were clarifying some points about voyage skill checkpoints. Power trip much? Gotta LOL at these folks that feel compelled to control the statements and words of others, and then claim that they are not trying to stifle criticism.

    Apparently, solid advice and criticism are too “negative” for the positivity crew. But, positivity crew is probably too positive of a name for them.

    I didn't respond to you on the other thread, and I probably shouldn't bother here either, but now you've tried to stir the pot on two separate threads about this. Enough is enough.

    You are being disingenuous, twisting people's points on multiple threads, and essentially just being a nuisance. You've stated repeatedly that you no longer play the game, so you're being a pest now at best, and a troll at worst.

    There was no power trip, no one got twisted up, or took issue, other than you. Stick to the facts, and stop making up lies to try to make a case that doesn't exist.

    You've already proven you can't have a discussion in good faith. When you can't argue your case with facts, you make nonsense claims at those who have proven you wrong. Your having to resort to petty arguments like these shows you don't have a leg to stand on.

    After you accused me of being Ben from WRG, because you couldn't respond to questions/statements with actual facts, that said enough about you. I'm likely wasting my time with this post to, but it needs to be said. I didn't want to engage with you again, but you've now tried to derail two separate threads with this.

    Personally, I don't see a point to you still hanging around here causing problems. Especially when you don't play the game anymore. This forum is for players. Perhaps you should let those still playing enjoy the game and the forums in peace.

    And once again, since I know you have to get the last word in, have at it. I won't be responding to you again.
  • BarnBurnerBarnBurner ✭✭✭✭
    IceCat wrote: »
    IceCat wrote: »
    Can we please keep this thread on track? This is not why I started it and I hope people can respect that.
    BarnBurner wrote: »
    IceCat wrote: »
    Can we please keep this thread on track? This is not why I started it and I hope people can respect that.

    You serious? Still seems pretty positive to me. Just some clarification on skill checks

    Just for context, that was literally all I said. People were starting to get off topic, and I simply wanted to keep the thread on point. Everyone else was fine with this. Except apparently you, @BarnBurner.
    BarnBurner wrote: »
    AviTrek wrote: »
    Such a fuss over a ***** in game avatar
    (that has zero impact on the game). 🙄😆

    An official reply from TP would be appropiate though. :)

    @Shan any chance of TP addressing this issue please? The No.1 artwork appears on many lower Captains Avatar. How are they receiving the Avatar?

    The number of real consequential bugs/features that they can worry about, and people continue to ask/care about avatars? I guess stuck voyages isn't a concern anymore and neither are new event types, just as long as as some lower ranked players don't get to use an avatar that was never introduced.

    Comments like these do nothing to resolve anything. Mostly, comments like these prove that the fanboys/fangirls/fanpeople are the most toxic people on these forums. Even the positivity threads owner got all twisted when a couple of people were clarifying some points about voyage skill checkpoints. Power trip much? Gotta LOL at these folks that feel compelled to control the statements and words of others, and then claim that they are not trying to stifle criticism.

    Apparently, solid advice and criticism are too “negative” for the positivity crew. But, positivity crew is probably too positive of a name for them.

    I didn't respond to you on the other thread, and I probably shouldn't bother here either, but now you've tried to stir the pot on two separate threads about this. Enough is enough.

    You are being disingenuous, twisting people's points on multiple threads, and essentially just being a nuisance. You've stated repeatedly that you no longer play the game, so you're being a pest now at best, and a troll at worst.

    There was no power trip, no one got twisted up, or took issue, other than you. Stick to the facts, and stop making up lies to try to make a case that doesn't exist.

    You've already proven you can't have a discussion in good faith. When you can't argue your case with facts, you make nonsense claims at those who have proven you wrong. Your having to resort to petty arguments like these shows you don't have a leg to stand on.

    After you accused me of being Ben from WRG, because you couldn't respond to questions/statements with actual facts, that said enough about you. I'm likely wasting my time with this post to, but it needs to be said. I didn't want to engage with you again, but you've now tried to derail two separate threads with this.

    Personally, I don't see a point to you still hanging around here causing problems. Especially when you don't play the game anymore. This forum is for players. Perhaps you should let those still playing enjoy the game and the forums in peace.

    And once again, since I know you have to get the last word in, have at it. I won't be responding to you again.

    Uninstalling the game does not delete my account. Nor does it remove any chance of me ever playing again. I invested time and money into this game and i would like for it to succeed, which in my opinion will require some measurable effort on the part of the developer.

    Now, you may want to take notice that telling people to leave or quit because they disagree with you will result in a waning playerbase, and a failing game. The rest of your reply is too nasty for me to waste my time on, as is usually the case. Besides that, im really not sure why you think you are justified in attempting to silence people.

    So lets keep this thread on track, this is not what the OP intended with their post.
  • [DC] Picard Loves Reds[DC] Picard Loves Reds ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2021
    nd4fvgeir8pn.jpg

    @Shan thanks for having the team take look.
Sign In or Register to comment.