Human Saru?? Stats are for real?
[KM] WOLF 359
✭✭✭
in The Bridge
If those are indeed correct, Human Saru is orders of two magnitudes better than the recent top voyager, Reunion Kirk and Spock. #2 DIP base, great traits, main Discovery crew.
The difference between Human Saru and Sporck is 247 points!! That's the difference between 2nd and 77th!!
That's more than creep, that's a full on avalanche!
The difference between Human Saru and Sporck is 247 points!! That's the difference between 2nd and 77th!!
That's more than creep, that's a full on avalanche!
3
Comments
There's an event discussion thread where this is already being discussed.
I see. Thanks
Here the new stats for Human Saru. The change is currently still scheduled to go live tomorrow.
FE 1/5, Level 100, CMD 661 (151 - 282), DIP 1080 (80 - 160), SCI 286 (103 - 265)
FE 5/5, Level 100, CMD 1089 (151 - 282), DIP 1470 (80 - 160), SCI 511 (103 - 265)
After
Ur correct, thx for pointing it out. 👍🏻
Need I say more?
I've got him at #338 out of 369 with my starbase and collection bonuses. There's some interesting names at the bottom
366) PW Keiko
367) Prof Sato
368) LtC Musiker
369) Kevin Uxbridge
Uxbridge is over 100 points lower than Musiker.
I find it interesting that Humaru has the top combined minimum roll (per VVT) by 81 points without bonuses. That means he'll pass more skill checks guaranteed longer than any other voyage crew. There's 38 other voyagers who can potentially pass checks longer, but those solid bases make Human Saru a very safe bet.
Thanks, geez I should of looked at prof. Sato. I did not look at her before my boosts. I was working from memory, forgetting that those were boosted numbers.
So in reality he will not look as bad in proficiency once I can see his boosted numbers.
😊👍
@Bylo Band , @Prime Lorca [10FH] , @JimBerlin , @Banjo1012 , @ everyone, LOL
Being a 12 hour chaser, high proficiency is my friend.
We did a whole big thread about that. And created a spreadsheet to show RNG impact. I might try to find the link tomorrow.
https://forum.disruptorbeam.com/stt/discussion/comment/242172#Comment_242172