Home The Bridge

Privacy review and violations

124»

Comments

  • DASR's on thier way!
  • I appreciate the response shan.

    as others have indicated, im disappointed that the actual concerns were not addressed. I wont need to consult with your privacy group, the matter is out of my hands.
  • weakinteractionweakinteraction ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 2022
    Shan wrote: »
    2. What personal data does IronSource collect via STT:

    The only data that is automatically shared with IronSource is the DBID, IP address, and Advertising ID (or a STT specific app ID if the Advertising ID cannot be used) , as well as device specifications such as screen size.

    The DBID is an identifier specific to Beamable systems that is assigned to your game account. It has no context outside of that system, and absent other information such as email addresses or 3rd party associations like Facebook sign-in, cannot be used to personally identify you.

    The IP address is collected by IronSource in order to ensure that ads and offers are localized correctly, as well as to check that all regional privacy standards (such as GDPR) are being observed.

    The Advertising ID is generated by your device, please note that you can limit the use of your Advertising ID, or reset it entirely, in your device settings.
    Lastly, device specifications are collected, such as screen size, in order to ensure that the offers and advertisements served are compatible with your device and will not crash the app as a result.

    There are many, many things to be concerned about in this situation, but I do just want to highlight that (as I'm pretty certain has been pointed out on previous occasions) the bit I've bolded in the quote seems to be trying to reassure us about the data being collected, but this is actually an admission that data consistent with the GDPR definition of "personally identifiable information" (which does include IP addresses etc. and absolutely would include the DBID) is being collected.

    My suspicion is that the parties involved here (especially, but not only, IronSource) are taking a maximalist view of what they're entitled to do under the "legitimate interests" part of the legislation, which frankly is a loophole wide enough to pilot a Borg cube through. This response seems to be crafted to try to obscure that as much as possible to avoid an adverse reaction from the player base. Given that people are now putting in DSARs, it would seem to have failed.
This discussion has been closed.