I have no horse in this race, nor do I want a 5-Alarm Dumpster Fire. I’m simply curious if any definitive statement will be made by TP regarding the accusation one way or the other? Silence or ambiguity will only lead to more rumors and resentment. At the very least, IMHO I think many players feel the measures taken by TP to prevent “cheating” are woefully inadequate. Again, I’m not endorsing one side or the other; just curious what TP will do to alleviate the situation.
“A committee is a cul-de-sac, down which good ideas are lured and quietly strangled.” —Mark TwainMEMBER: [BoB] Barrel of Bloodwine... We are recruiting and putting the “curv” in scurvy! Best Event Finish: #3 Honor Debt: Inconceivable...Honor Bank Account: Slowly building...
I have no horse in this race, nor do I want a 5-Alarm Dumpster Fire. I’m simply curious if any definitive statement will be made by TP regarding the accusation one way or the other? Silence or ambiguity will only lead to more rumors and resentment. At the very least, IMHO I think many players feel the measures taken by TP to prevent “cheating” are woefully inadequate. Again, I’m not endorsing one side or the other; just curious what TP will do to alleviate the situation.
Sadly, I think most players have very little faith in them doing anything to address this very serious issue.
I have no horse in this race, nor do I want a 5-Alarm Dumpster Fire. I’m simply curious if any definitive statement will be made by TP regarding the accusation one way or the other? Silence or ambiguity will only lead to more rumors and resentment. At the very least, IMHO I think many players feel the measures taken by TP to prevent “cheating” are woefully inadequate. Again, I’m not endorsing one side or the other; just curious what TP will do to alleviate the situation.
Sadly, I think most players have very little faith in them doing anything to address this very serious issue.
At the moment, it's only an accusation made by a bitter loser who has yet to provide any evidence
funny how he never posted anything like this when it was blatantly obvious that Rom was cheating
And maybe he has memory problems because there certainly was speculation that he used "help" when he won a skirmish
Glass houses, pot kettles & all that
So, let's pretend that is true. Does that mean that everyone can cheat without repercussions now? The ones who lose out are those who play fairly. Shouldn't we want events to be fair?
I have no horse in this race, nor do I want a 5-Alarm Dumpster Fire. I’m simply curious if any definitive statement will be made by TP regarding the accusation one way or the other? Silence or ambiguity will only lead to more rumors and resentment. At the very least, IMHO I think many players feel the measures taken by TP to prevent “cheating” are woefully inadequate. Again, I’m not endorsing one side or the other; just curious what TP will do to alleviate the situation.
Sadly, I think most players have very little faith in them doing anything to address this very serious issue.
At the moment, it's only an accusation made by a bitter loser who has yet to provide any evidence
Your calling him a "loser" says more about you than his possibly false accusation.
There have been plenty of players who've seen odd behaviour that was almost certainly cheating of some kind. Clearly the Devs agreed, because they even made modifications to the last update to make cheating more difficult.
Some of the things being done in this game are all but impossible, especially in the time constraints they are being done in, without some form of unethical assistance. Some scores are unobtainable in short periods of time, unless Data is suddenly playing this game.
For a game that's a representation of Star Trek, and by extension, the Federation ideals, you'd think that fair play would be, pardon the pun, paramount. Yet, there sometimes certainly are a lot of Ferengi, Cardassian and Romulan attitudes running rampant in the player base 😒
Just another reason people are not playing the game like they used to. Events are a central part of this game. If they aren't fair, then this whole game is a waste of time.
Even if you don't believe this specific accusation, if you think there is absolutely no cheating going on, you're naive. 🖖🏽
funny how he never posted anything like this when it was blatantly obvious that Rom was cheating
And maybe he has memory problems because there certainly was speculation that he used "help" when he won a skirmish
Glass houses, pot kettles & all that
So, let's pretend that is true. Does that mean that everyone can cheat without repercussions now? The ones who lose out are those who play fairly. Shouldn't we want events to be fair?
I dunno where you came to the above but of course not. In no way is cheating just
We all know that a certain player whose name begins & ends with R & M pretty much 99% cheated at skirmish. But where was namer reporting this?
funny how he never posted anything like this when it was blatantly obvious that Rom was cheating
And maybe he has memory problems because there certainly was speculation that he used "help" when he won a skirmish
Glass houses, pot kettles & all that
So, let's pretend that is true. Does that mean that everyone can cheat without repercussions now? The ones who lose out are those who play fairly. Shouldn't we want events to be fair?
I dunno where you came to the above but of course not. In no way is cheating just
We all know that a certain player whose name begins & ends with R & M pretty much 99% cheated at skirmish. But where was namer reporting this?
If you have proof of this player cheating, why aren't YOU providing it? Instead of peddling in innuendo, you could just as easily name the player and when you think they cheated.
Is Namer now the only person capable of calling out cheaters? Should he be calling out every cheater, lest he be accused of some nefarious agenda?
Your calling him a "loser" says more about you than his possibly false accusation.
Even if you don't believe this specific accusation, if you think there is absolutely no cheating going on, you're naive. 🖖🏽
He lost out to first place. Lost = loser.
noun
a person or thing that loses or has lost something, especially a game or contest.
"he was the loser in the race"
I have provided numerous examples of events where cheating has gone on that you yourself have responded to, so no thank you I'm not naive 😂
We all know you calling him that has everything to do with his current stand. Otherwise, you'd be calling us all the same thing. Don't pretend you're not either.
You seem to either have some personal vendetta or are engaging in bad faith, so until you have shown otherwise, I'm done engaging with you. Others have backed Namer and you seemed to be the only one who's trying to undermine him.
funny how he never posted anything like this when it was blatantly obvious that Rom was cheating
And maybe he has memory problems because there certainly was speculation that he used "help" when he won a skirmish
Glass houses, pot kettles & all that
So, let's pretend that is true. Does that mean that everyone can cheat without repercussions now? The ones who lose out are those who play fairly. Shouldn't we want events to be fair?
I dunno where you came to the above but of course not. In no way is cheating just
We all know that a certain player whose name begins & ends with R & M pretty much 99% cheated at skirmish. But where was namer reporting this?
If you have proof of this player cheating, why aren't YOU providing it? Instead of peddling in innuendo, you could just as easily name the player and when you think they cheated.
Is Namer now the only person capable of calling out cheaters? Should he be calling out every cheater, lest he be accused of some nefarious agenda?
Your calling him a "loser" says more about you than his possibly false accusation.
Even if you don't believe this specific accusation, if you think there is absolutely no cheating going on, you're naive. 🖖🏽
He lost out to first place. Lost = loser.
noun
a person or thing that loses or has lost something, especially a game or contest.
"he was the loser in the race"
I have provided numerous examples of events where cheating has gone on that you yourself have responded to, so no thank you I'm not naive 😂
We all know you calling him that has everything to do with his current stand. Otherwise, you'd be calling us all the same thing. Don't pretend you're not either.
You seem to either have some personal vendetta or are engaging in bad faith, so until you have shown otherwise, I'm done engaging with you. Others have backed Namer and you seemed to be the only one who's trying to undermine him.
Thankyou for being able to know how my mind works 😆😆
The thought of using loser in the other way never crossed my mind. Top 3 is all that matters
You thinking I was using it in a derogatory way maybe says more about you 🤔 I admit that maybe runner up maybe would have been better
funny how he never posted anything like this when it was blatantly obvious that Rom was cheating
And maybe he has memory problems because there certainly was speculation that he used "help" when he won a skirmish
Glass houses, pot kettles & all that
So, let's pretend that is true. Does that mean that everyone can cheat without repercussions now? The ones who lose out are those who play fairly. Shouldn't we want events to be fair?
I dunno where you came to the above but of course not. In no way is cheating just
We all know that a certain player whose name begins & ends with R & M pretty much 99% cheated at skirmish. But where was namer reporting this?
If you have proof of this player cheating, why aren't YOU providing it? Instead of peddling in innuendo, you could just as easily name the player and when you think they cheated.
Is Namer now the only person capable of calling out cheaters? Should he be calling out every cheater, lest he be accused of some nefarious agenda?
Your calling him a "loser" says more about you than his possibly false accusation.
Even if you don't believe this specific accusation, if you think there is absolutely no cheating going on, you're naive. 🖖🏽
He lost out to first place. Lost = loser.
noun
a person or thing that loses or has lost something, especially a game or contest.
"he was the loser in the race"
I have provided numerous examples of events where cheating has gone on that you yourself have responded to, so no thank you I'm not naive 😂
We all know you calling him that has everything to do with his current stand. Otherwise, you'd be calling us all the same thing. Don't pretend you're not either.
You seem to either have some personal vendetta or are engaging in bad faith, so until you have shown otherwise, I'm done engaging with you. Others have backed Namer and you seemed to be the only one who's trying to undermine him.
Thankyou for being able to know how my mind works 😆😆
The thought of using loser in the other way never crossed my mind. Top 3 is all that matters
You thinking I was using it in a derogatory way maybe says more about you 🤔 I admit that maybe runner up maybe would have been better
This will be my final response to you. You've proven you're not engaging in good faith, multiple times. Troll elsewhere.
You chose loser over runner up for a reason. Your motives are clear.
Perhaps more importantly, I asked why aren't you providing your proof of the cheating accusation you made. You ignored the question entirely. If this were truly about calling out cheaters and not discrediting Namer, you would have done so.
Comments
Seen on bigbook...
I have no horse in this race, nor do I want a 5-Alarm Dumpster Fire. I’m simply curious if any definitive statement will be made by TP regarding the accusation one way or the other? Silence or ambiguity will only lead to more rumors and resentment. At the very least, IMHO I think many players feel the measures taken by TP to prevent “cheating” are woefully inadequate. Again, I’m not endorsing one side or the other; just curious what TP will do to alleviate the situation.
Sadly, I think most players have very little faith in them doing anything to address this very serious issue.
And maybe he has memory problems because there certainly was speculation that he used "help" when he won a skirmish
Glass houses, pot kettles & all that
At the moment, it's only an accusation made by a bitter loser who has yet to provide any evidence
So, let's pretend that is true. Does that mean that everyone can cheat without repercussions now? The ones who lose out are those who play fairly. Shouldn't we want events to be fair?
Your calling him a "loser" says more about you than his possibly false accusation.
There have been plenty of players who've seen odd behaviour that was almost certainly cheating of some kind. Clearly the Devs agreed, because they even made modifications to the last update to make cheating more difficult.
Some of the things being done in this game are all but impossible, especially in the time constraints they are being done in, without some form of unethical assistance. Some scores are unobtainable in short periods of time, unless Data is suddenly playing this game.
For a game that's a representation of Star Trek, and by extension, the Federation ideals, you'd think that fair play would be, pardon the pun, paramount. Yet, there sometimes certainly are a lot of Ferengi, Cardassian and Romulan attitudes running rampant in the player base 😒
Just another reason people are not playing the game like they used to. Events are a central part of this game. If they aren't fair, then this whole game is a waste of time.
Even if you don't believe this specific accusation, if you think there is absolutely no cheating going on, you're naive. 🖖🏽
I dunno where you came to the above but of course not. In no way is cheating just
We all know that a certain player whose name begins & ends with R & M pretty much 99% cheated at skirmish. But where was namer reporting this?
He lost out to first place. Lost = loser.
I have provided numerous examples of events where cheating has gone on that you yourself have responded to, so no thank you I'm not naive 😂
If you have proof of this player cheating, why aren't YOU providing it? Instead of peddling in innuendo, you could just as easily name the player and when you think they cheated.
Is Namer now the only person capable of calling out cheaters? Should he be calling out every cheater, lest he be accused of some nefarious agenda?
We all know you calling him that has everything to do with his current stand. Otherwise, you'd be calling us all the same thing. Don't pretend you're not either.
You seem to either have some personal vendetta or are engaging in bad faith, so until you have shown otherwise, I'm done engaging with you. Others have backed Namer and you seemed to be the only one who's trying to undermine him.
Thankyou for being able to know how my mind works 😆😆
The thought of using loser in the other way never crossed my mind. Top 3 is all that matters
You thinking I was using it in a derogatory way maybe says more about you 🤔 I admit that maybe runner up maybe would have been better
This will be my final response to you. You've proven you're not engaging in good faith, multiple times. Troll elsewhere.
You chose loser over runner up for a reason. Your motives are clear.
Perhaps more importantly, I asked why aren't you providing your proof of the cheating accusation you made. You ignored the question entirely. If this were truly about calling out cheaters and not discrediting Namer, you would have done so.