Shan's PSA: I will be unavailable from 08/13 until 08/22 included.
•• Be kind to each other and to all WRG Staff :) ••
While regular communications will happen in my absence please understand there might be delays.
For an issue in game please submit a ticket to support and, if you feel it is needed, post in the relevant category (Engineering Room) Thank you, take care of each other, and see you soon! ˜Shan <3
•• Be kind to each other and to all WRG Staff :) ••
While regular communications will happen in my absence please understand there might be delays.
For an issue in game please submit a ticket to support and, if you feel it is needed, post in the relevant category (Engineering Room) Thank you, take care of each other, and see you soon! ˜Shan <3
Discovery/Section 31
in The Holodeck
Is this just a conspiracy theory or is it true?
“What's a knockout like you doing in a computer-generated gin joint like this?”
Check out my ‘Characters’ thread on the holodeck!
Proud member of Patterns of Force
Captain Level 93
Played since January 2017
TP: Do better!!!
Check out my ‘Characters’ thread on the holodeck!
Proud member of Patterns of Force
Captain Level 93
Played since January 2017
TP: Do better!!!
0
Comments
- My opinion is that it is purely coincidental
What do you think? True or false?
Check out my ‘Characters’ thread on the holodeck!
Proud member of Patterns of Force
Captain Level 93
Played since January 2017
TP: Do better!!!
Anyway, Section 31 ALREADY existed in ST: Enterprise (set roughly 80 years before Discovery), in fact Malcolm Reed had been working for them as well, so Discovery is not the beginning of such organisation.
This section takes the name from Article 14, Section 31 from the original Starfleet Charter, so if the ship's number were an indicator of Discovery being from this organisation, wouldn't it make more sense that the number were in fact 1431?
Magic Vessel that gets destroyed by Klingons, not sure the name was fitting lol