Home The Bridge

Increase relevancy of outdated 5* crew

Cpt_insano_2k1Cpt_insano_2k1 ✭✭✭✭✭
Would you be in favor of adding older, underpowered 5* crew to voyage rewards and simultaneously removing them from the portal pulls?

Increase relevancy of outdated 5* crew 170 votes

Yes
64%
ADM Fletcher [ET]Captain TFSabine of AthensCaptain DurfNad Hal[QH] OxmyxJim RaynorFletcher ChristianNS111111[TLA]  84wbTopicaldext74Bakkster[SSR]TrollhammerenRennJaxoPhotonKimDrone_oneK Han Solo Ng & Thank4 All DteaThaiGQJean-Luc Kenobi 110 votes
No
12%
AviTrekSSR BarkleyHaBlack[Deleted User]RaraRacingJayBeezy[S47] ELiLCommodore SuluGib - Admiral MarinersKarthonKurppanaCaptain P (ESB)sagimaVerzweigterTarisBylo BandFi®3wallCuttysarkExanimus[TKO]TrainWay© 22 votes
Maybe.......
22%
[RotP]Ran Airen[KM]VidemGeneral McDuckJim SteelebarrydancerCommander Sinclair12345678 of 123456789SoupKitchen RikergregorytOdo MarmarosaLady Sansa BlacktydeTP do better!! ~Colli~ (PoF)LeadHeadIronagedaveCranky (SC) Mirror Cartman{DD} SmellyNecronjonRoxtonAandraa 38 votes
«134

Comments

  • Veterinary PhloxVeterinary Phlox ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe.......
    I Iike the idea of adding them to voyages, but not removing them from the portal.
    Six degrees in Inter-species Veterinary Medicine. Treating all manner of critters, from Tribbles to Humans.

    Starport
  • Maybe.......
    Shy Khan wrote: »
    Adding to Voyages is fine, removing from Portal is not; that would only benefit more veteran players, not the entire community.

    +1
    “What's a knockout like you doing in a computer-generated gin joint like this?”

    Proud member of Patterns of Force
    Captain Level 99
    Played since January 2017

    TP: Do better!!!
  • Drago MusevniDrago Musevni ✭✭✭✭
    Yes
    I'd have no problem with tier 9-10 crew being removed from the portal. The less chance I have of getting a Tosk / Shinzon / Rozhenkos behold, the better.
    01000010 01101001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100001 01110011 01110011 00100001
  • Maybe.......
    Crew should continue to be available from the portal since that's the most likely source. As long as there's only the stock portals not sorted by year of release, I think they should remain in the portal.

    I do see some benefit to removing them entirely for all players - no more crap unfused golds to clog up valuable crew slots, but I think this would ultimately irritate the collectors too much. Some of the older cards might still be useful as faction bonus crew and that could benefit newer players more so than older players.

    I do like the idea of adding them to voyages, but I don't know what the right cut-off period would be. Even at 10-12 hours, someone could run an all-dilemma voyage and potentially come back with quite a few golds. I think this would overly devalue them and also overly benefit people willing to do long voyages.
  • Yes
    Agree the gold pool is too bloated, taking the oldest and poorest (statistically) cards from portal will improve chances of worthwhile golds for all. Unconvinced voyage rewards are the best way to increase relevance of older crew. Especially for newer players.

    I would suggest older legendaries as easier threshold rewards in events, as short term achievements, and/or collection bonuses would be more impactful?
  • CuttysarkCuttysark ✭✭✭
    edited June 2020
    No
    This just a way to benefit "veteran" players while throwing rubbish to the "newbies" ... and of course all the "veterans" would want them not to drop on voyages until at least like the 10-12 hour mark which most "newbies" don't get to anyways. "OH BOY another tier 10 card! How lucky am I?? Golly gee whiz!"

    This whole idea **tsk tsk** (IE: creates a great big vacuous hole in the surrounding atmosphere ... apparently things aren't allowed to s**k here? Don't try to sell a Kirby here! lol) Most of the cards that drop on voyages are rubbish already ... I can't recall ever getting a tier 5 or above card on a voyage. One has to buy those ...

    So fine: add them as drops on voyages but keep them in the portal too! All's fair isn't it? ;)
    Remember: it's just a game, not a matter of life and death!

    My Captain Idol's
    My DataCore page
    My Spreadsheet
  • Jean-Luc KenobiJean-Luc Kenobi ✭✭✭
    edited June 2020
    Yes
    S31 wrote: »
    Put older legendary cards as a Threshold event crew in events.

    Something like a re-run.

    Even a Galaxy event where you get a 4/5 Legendary (3 threshold plus one community) would be awesome.

    I've always been a fan and advocate of putting old cards in tresholds in every event. Yes, it would increase the competition but more competition could mean more possible dilithium spending means more $$ in WR pockets.

    I don't think a 4/5 legendary in one event would be a good idea. But if you had a fixed rotating set of four legendaries then you could end up with four 4/5 golds every quarter if you clear tresholds up to 400k every week (could be made a lower rank). Did I explain that properly? So from Jan-April you'll have the same legendaries alternating as rewards. Then May-August a new set of 4 and finally September-December another set of 4. So at the end of the year you'd have 16 4/5 old legendaries which would help people finish out collections or if you're a newer player make your crew stronger. What if there's an extra week in a month, well you can just add a random super rare or just leave it blank for that week. Asking for a citation would be stretching it a bit there. I hope I explained this properly, and if I didn't anyone that likes my idea can feel free to reword what I've said.

    What about the recurring legendary during a mega??? It'll still be there as its in the 25k treshold bracket.

    Overall rewards need a drastic overhaul imo, but thats a conversation for another thread.

  • IronagedaveIronagedave ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 2020
    Maybe.......
    I'm definitely on the maybe side of the fence there are a lot of factors to consider.

    1) The horrible possibilities of RNG
    2) How many Legendaries are "declassified" from the portal.
    3) How many drops should one get from voyages, 1 every time you hit 10+ hours or longer, is there possibility of multiple drops. Or is it going to be small chance of drop similar to other crew drops i.e completely random.
    4) Voyage drops are like straight drops no choice unlike the possibilities of a Begold from a portal pack.

    Depending on the above you could end up reducing players chances rather than improving them.
    Remember you need 5 to fully fuse, so that's the most fusions with the lowest chance of a card dropping. Not to mention an ever expanding number of them, thus taking them out of portal drops completely may do more harm then good.

    Perhaps a way forward is creating another merit type pack say 15,000 or 20,000 merits or something like that for a begold tied to "Season 1" (year 1 of the game) "Season 2" (year 2 of the game) as many have suggested before about having selective older portal packs.
    [was on Sabbatical/Hiatus] Currently a trialist at Galaxy SquadronSTAY SAFE and KBO
  • ThurthoradThurthorad ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes
    Shy Khan wrote: »
    Adding to Voyages is fine, removing from Portal is not; that would only benefit more veteran players, not the entire community.

    Completely disagree with this. A lot of older crew are a trap for resources for newer players. A lot of older crew are basically useless except for events after you've been playing for a modest amount of time. It would be a lot better for newer players to have increased probability of getting better crew.
  • Prime LorcaPrime Lorca ✭✭✭✭✭
    Personally, I would also put a new discounted pack in the portal for those older legendaries. I would make it a sale type thing that runs for a week. Year 1 legendary beholds for what... 990 dilithium? That's cheaper than a birthday behold, but it's a bigger (probably weaker) pool. And then maybe run year 2 a couple months later. Years 3 and 4 would stay in the portal and out of voyages until their time finally comes. If only the two most recent years are in the portal, then the packs gain value, imo. They are newer, stronger crew. Newer players are more likely to have won them in events. I think there is a compromise that could make both sides happy. :)
    Farewell 🖖
  • No
    Adding to voyage rewards yes, removing them from the portal no, most of the voyage rewards other than the voyage unique are in the portal.
  • AldudeAldude ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe.......
    I, like others here, am in support of adding them to voyages but not removing them from the portal.
    I would say I'm a seasoned player, but I only own 30% of all possible gold cards (and only 5% immortal). With a 58% chance of adding a star from a begold... Yeah - I need these cards in the portal.
    Fleet Admiral of NCC UK Midlands."Leave any bigotry in your quarters. There's no room for it on the bridge." - J.T. Kirk, 2266
  • RaraRacingRaraRacing ✭✭✭✭✭
    No
    The question/suggestion put forward is too extreme ... there are a lot more elegant solutions to the "issue" that people think that older 5* cards are poor.

    The examples always seen are "worst-case scenario" crew ... e.g. above: Rozhenkos are actually "new crew" (late 2018), Tosk is from mid-2018 ...

    There are plenty of first-year (say up till end 2017) crew that are pretty decent ... for each poor crew someone mentions here I can list good to excellent crew ...

    So, what do you mean by "old" crew? Just crew who are considered poor? Crew prior to 2018? ... but then you can still pull poor crew (Mirror Landry, the above two crew, Diversion Yates etc.) from your portal pulls.

    1. Should they be added to voyages? Yes, that is a good idea that has been put forward many times here.
    2. Removed from the portal? No.

    Elegant solutions are:
    - Splitting the portal into various "ages" - e.g. behold pulls from a select year - this has already been implemented a bit through the newer birthday pulls.
    - adding 1 * of older crew to relevant events at the end of thresholds.
    - etc.
  • ProontProont ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe.......
    Add them to voyages? Sure.
    Remove them from the portal? No.
  • ThurthoradThurthorad ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes
    I think we need some clarification on what 'remove from portal' means. For me it means taking them out of Premium Packs, but not removing them from purchase. I think there should be a non-premium pack, perhaps a junk pack, that is cheaper and offers value purchases.

    I think adding them to Voyages will be futile unless they appear below 10 hrs (even if rarely) or fairly frequently above 10 hrs or else you are going to have people moaning about the fact that they've never seen one. Remember, the point is to get these older Legendaries into peoples hand so that they can freeze them or actually make characters you wouldn't dream of citing actually useful,
  • Prime LorcaPrime Lorca ✭✭✭✭✭
    Aldude wrote: »
    I, like others here, am in support of adding them to voyages but not removing them from the portal.
    I would say I'm a seasoned player, but I only own 30% of all possible gold cards (and only 5% immortal). With a 58% chance of adding a star from a begold... Yeah - I need these cards in the portal.

    How old are the majority of your golds? If they are in the last 3 years, then the odds of adding a star would go up, statistically, if golds that you do not have are removed from the pool.
    Farewell 🖖
  • ThurthoradThurthorad ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes
    RaraRacing wrote: »
    The question/suggestion put forward is too extreme ... there are a lot more elegant solutions to the "issue" that people think that older 5* cards are poor.

    The examples always seen are "worst-case scenario" crew ... e.g. above: Rozhenkos are actually "new crew" (late 2018), Tosk is from mid-2018 ...

    There are plenty of first-year (say up till end 2017) crew that are pretty decent ... for each poor crew someone mentions here I can list good to excellent crew ...

    So, what do you mean by "old" crew? Just crew who are considered poor? Crew prior to 2018? ... but then you can still pull poor crew (Mirror Landry, the above two crew, Diversion Yates etc.) from your portal pulls.

    1. Should they be added to voyages? Yes, that is a good idea that has been put forward many times here.
    2. Removed from the portal? No.

    Elegant solutions are:
    - Splitting the portal into various "ages" - e.g. behold pulls from a select year - this has already been implemented a bit through the newer birthday pulls.
    - adding 1 * of older crew to relevant events at the end of thresholds.
    - etc.

    Those 'worst-case scenarios' happen regularly as my roster of unlevelled 1* Legendaries can attest. There is a lot of junk in the portal these days.

    My definition of junk is a character that does something weaker than 2 or 3 other available characters. I do consider bridge crew junk if they are weak even if they theoretically have more event usage than normal. Another way to think about junk characters is 'Would I cite this character?' If the answer is no, they are junk because a 1/5 is thrash and your odds of getting additional stars without citing them is low and getting ever lower the more they add to the premium packs.
  • Dirk GundersonDirk Gunderson ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes
    If and only if the portal pool isn’t going to be broken down into smaller chunks, this sounds like a workable plan. I would shy away from expecting anything to be based on Big Book tiers, however. There has been direct interaction with player-made resources on occasion, like yesterday’s Timelines Talks interview or ye olden days when Nod would make wiki edits, but adjusting the portal pool based on the Big Book would be a step or two too far. In any case, shrinking the portal pool naturally increases the chances of pulling one of the remaining crew (which benefits everyone) and how many veterans really need/want Shinzon or Grilka from a voyage anyway? Granted, only pulling Decrepit Legendaries and not the older 4* crew may not move the needle all that much given the low drop rate for 5* crew.

    The number of launch day or Year One legendaries that are still useful on a regular basis (not just for events) is sadly pretty small. Some gauntleteers come to mind (e.g. Gangster Spock) and a few have somehow managed to avoid getting power-creeped into oblivion (like RAF O’Brien), and anyone who can fill a larger collection isn’t likely to be needed to finish said collection. Crew for vanity collections would be the draw here and yes, veterans are more likely to care about these but the actual rewards for those beyond personal satisfaction are rather meager.

    Again, I would prefer to see the portal pool broken down into seasons - allow voyage rewards to still draw 4* crew from all of them (or maybe not?) and discount the pack price for the older seasons by 50 dil per year down to a floor of maybe 400 dil. This might also provide WRG with a framework for regular, planned portal updates. I had started to write my plan out in a text format but it got confusing pretty quickly so I shifted gears to a visual format:

    h6qkbtdqha85.jpeg

    I would think option 2 or option 3 would be a nice balance between having the main portal pool big enough to keep people from running out of crew to buy while not being so diluted that people avoid premium packs entirely. I also think having a regular portal update structure helps us make better purchasing decisions and allows WRG to plan ahead when it comes to resource allocation devoted to the update itself.

    And maybe all the different season packs don’t need to be available at all times...instead of featuring all prior seasons in another tab in the Time Portal, always have one past season featured right next to the premium portal pool for, say, 500 dil and rotate out what season is featured on a periodic basis.
  • RaraRacingRaraRacing ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 2020
    No
    Thurthorad wrote: »
    RaraRacing wrote: »
    The question/suggestion put forward is too extreme ... there are a lot more elegant solutions to the "issue" that people think that older 5* cards are poor.

    The examples always seen are "worst-case scenario" crew ... e.g. above: Rozhenkos are actually "new crew" (late 2018), Tosk is from mid-2018 ...

    There are plenty of first-year (say up till end 2017) crew that are pretty decent ... for each poor crew someone mentions here I can list good to excellent crew ...

    So, what do you mean by "old" crew? Just crew who are considered poor? Crew prior to 2018? ... but then you can still pull poor crew (Mirror Landry, the above two crew, Diversion Yates etc.) from your portal pulls.

    1. Should they be added to voyages? Yes, that is a good idea that has been put forward many times here.
    2. Removed from the portal? No.

    Elegant solutions are:
    - Splitting the portal into various "ages" - e.g. behold pulls from a select year - this has already been implemented a bit through the newer birthday pulls.
    - adding 1 * of older crew to relevant events at the end of thresholds.
    - etc.

    Those 'worst-case scenarios' happen regularly as my roster of unlevelled 1* Legendaries can attest. There is a lot of junk in the portal these days.

    My definition of junk is a character that does something weaker than 2 or 3 other available characters. I do consider bridge crew junk if they are weak even if they theoretically have more event usage than normal. Another way to think about junk characters is 'Would I cite this character?' If the answer is no, they are junk because a 1/5 is thrash and your odds of getting additional stars without citing them is low and getting ever lower the more they add to the premium packs.

    By your standards, Linnis Paris would never even be added to the portal ... she's not even out yet.

    That you personally don't value specific crew doesn't mean they should be removed from the portal ...
    You could:
    a) not pick them in a behold;
    b) airlock them for 550 Honor ... Piñata style.

    Dismissing crew because they are not top 2 in what they do is not reasonable ... there are so many new crew that fit the category ... e.g. the new Kira (she's not top 2 in anything) ... that they would never see the light of a portal pack.

    You're just asking for packs to only include the "best" (as per your standards) 50 crew in the game ... why even create new cards then?
  • SSR BarkleySSR Barkley ✭✭✭✭✭
    No
    removing old cards from the portal is NOT ok. people rely on portals to fill their rosters out and to create more roster room by sending those cards into the vault

    Also, there is no objective way of separating crew other than time of release. The "tiering" system in bbob is more of a subjective guide to aid players make choices between characters.
    /SSR/ Barkley - semi retired
    Second Star to the Right - Join Today!
  • ThurthoradThurthorad ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes
    RaraRacing wrote: »
    Thurthorad wrote: »
    RaraRacing wrote: »
    The question/suggestion put forward is too extreme ... there are a lot more elegant solutions to the "issue" that people think that older 5* cards are poor.

    The examples always seen are "worst-case scenario" crew ... e.g. above: Rozhenkos are actually "new crew" (late 2018), Tosk is from mid-2018 ...

    There are plenty of first-year (say up till end 2017) crew that are pretty decent ... for each poor crew someone mentions here I can list good to excellent crew ...

    So, what do you mean by "old" crew? Just crew who are considered poor? Crew prior to 2018? ... but then you can still pull poor crew (Mirror Landry, the above two crew, Diversion Yates etc.) from your portal pulls.

    1. Should they be added to voyages? Yes, that is a good idea that has been put forward many times here.
    2. Removed from the portal? No.

    Elegant solutions are:
    - Splitting the portal into various "ages" - e.g. behold pulls from a select year - this has already been implemented a bit through the newer birthday pulls.
    - adding 1 * of older crew to relevant events at the end of thresholds.
    - etc.

    Those 'worst-case scenarios' happen regularly as my roster of unlevelled 1* Legendaries can attest. There is a lot of junk in the portal these days.

    My definition of junk is a character that does something weaker than 2 or 3 other available characters. I do consider bridge crew junk if they are weak even if they theoretically have more event usage than normal. Another way to think about junk characters is 'Would I cite this character?' If the answer is no, they are junk because a 1/5 is thrash and your odds of getting additional stars without citing them is low and getting ever lower the more they add to the premium packs.

    By your standards, Linnis Paris would never even be added to the portal ... she's not even out yet.

    That you personally don't value specific crew doesn't mean they should be removed from the portal ...
    You could:
    a) not pick them in a behold;
    b) airlock them for 550 Honor ... Piñata style.

    Dismissing crew because they are not top 2 in what they do is not reasonable ... there are so many new crew that fit the category ... e.g. the new Kira (she's not top 2 in anything) ... that they would never see the light of a portal pack.

    You're just asking for packs to only include the "best" (as per your standards) 50 crew in the game ... why even create new cards then?

    I am not suggesting removing all bad crew, I am suggesting removing older crew. And I am suggesting that almost all of older crew are junk. New crew like Linnus and Kay have 3x bonus event use and therefore you might invest in them to that end, and that's entirely reasonable. But there are a good 50 or more legendary older crew that genuinely have almost no actual gameplay value anymore.

    And I accept that removing older crew won't magically make all behold options great choices, but it will improve the odds of that being the case.

    I don't proactively Pinata, but they are certainly on the chopping block should the need arise. I can accept 10 to 1 odds of getting something decent out of a premium pack, but these days it's more like 50 to 1. Most beholds are filled with immortalised, mediocre or downright awful choices. And again, I don't want them to be unavailable, I just want them in a cheaper pack where the cost is commensurate with their gameplay value.

  • ExanimusExanimus ✭✭✭✭
    No
    More honour piggy banks for the ivory towers after 10 hours, no surprise. Have to make sure they are the only ones with access. Pathetic
Sign In or Register to comment.