Still with this "Century" naming convention. I guess we just have to get use to this odd word choice.
But bringing the Xindi-Aquatics into the game is a nice balm; and it's looking like a really good Dip shuttler too (base is 1300+).
I guess "San Francisco" wouldn't fit? I would've preferred "1893" or "1890s" to this but maybe they're worried it would be too confusing with 1701 Sisko, 1701 Bashir, etc.
Madam Guinan - I think that was exactly what she was introduced as in that episode
Looking for a fine fleet? With the game having reached the age of a small child, players went and newly joined. We are an active fleet and are also connected in friendship with Klingons. Grab your daily starbase donations. Get your daily Fleet Boss Battles rewards guaranteed? Chat about Trek? Want more than just the game? Consider joining [TLA] "The Liberal Alliance"Contact me in-game [TLA] Khazaan or even better on the LINE app, handle also "khazaan".
I wish we could have that background art as a bridge crew background. Maybe as the reward for the second tier of a Time's Arrow collection. The art is already there in the game. Why not re-use it?
The XA is in 3 collections and has great Dip Base. I sense great competition.
XAC is a terrible voyager, imo. Doesn't even make the top 150 with my bonuses. Voyage traits are too few. The top 300 legendaries with 3 skills in terms of matching voyage traits have at least a 50% chance to match a trait. XAC is below 50%. Event potential seems fairly low.
Bottom line, I expect very little competition. If I join the fray, it will only be due to boredom.
The XA is in 3 collections and has great Dip Base. I sense great competition.
XAC is a terrible voyager, imo. Doesn't even make the top 150 with my bonuses. Voyage traits are too few. The top 300 legendaries with 3 skills in terms of matching voyage traits have at least a 50% chance to match a trait. XAC is below 50%. Event potential seems fairly low.
Bottom line, I expect very little competition. If I join the fray, it will only be due to boredom.
I'm inclined to agree. SHe's also (almost definitely) event crew for a Skirmish event, which means I don't need her to rank well. As cool as it is that she's finally in the game, I don't need another 1/5 clogging up the works.
The XA is in 3 collections and has great Dip Base. I sense great competition.
XAC is a terrible voyager, imo. Doesn't even make the top 150 with my bonuses. Voyage traits are too few. The top 300 legendaries with 3 skills in terms of matching voyage traits have at least a 50% chance to match a trait. XAC is below 50%. Event potential seems fairly low.
Bottom line, I expect very little competition. If I join the fray, it will only be due to boredom.
And DIP/ENG has a ton of great voyagers as well. Just limited to the top 100 you've got Adira Tal, Ishan Chaye, Bridge Officer #1, Stranded Quark, and Interfaced La Force - with extra support from Dexa, Zheng He Riker, EDF Adira, Red Angle, Maxwell Forrest, Amelia Earhart, and Laborer Kirk.
Six degrees in Inter-species Veterinary Medicine. Treating all manner of critters, from Tribbles to Humans.
Still with this "Century" naming convention. I guess we just have to get use to this odd word choice.
But bringing the Xindi-Aquatics into the game is a nice balm; and it's looking like a really good Dip shuttler too (base is 1300+).
The naming bugs me, too. I am surprised they doubled-down on it after "Century Nurse Crusher". I just assumed it was supposed to be something like "19th Century..." but they realized they couldn't start a name with a number, couldn't get around it and just lopped it off at the last minute. But if they're doing it again maybe it was (mind-bogglingly) intentional? Or they made the same mistake twice.
Still with this "Century" naming convention. I guess we just have to get use to this odd word choice.
But bringing the Xindi-Aquatics into the game is a nice balm; and it's looking like a really good Dip shuttler too (base is 1300+).
The naming bugs me, too. I am surprised they doubled-down on it after "Century Nurse Crusher". I just assumed it was supposed to be something like "19th Century..." but they realized they couldn't start a name with a number, couldn't get around it and just lopped it off at the last minute. But if they're doing it again maybe it was (mind-bogglingly) intentional? Or they made the same mistake twice.
That is not what bugs me. What bugs me is that she is not a physician. Makes it a lil harder to use her in voyages and another physician would be greatly helpful to finishing the expanded physician collection. Nurse makes sense for the episode but physician would be helpful. She was after all a physician in disguise as a nurse.
Comments
But bringing the Xindi-Aquatics into the game is a nice balm; and it's looking like a really good Dip shuttler too (base is 1300+).
I guess "San Francisco" wouldn't fit? I would've preferred "1893" or "1890s" to this but maybe they're worried it would be too confusing with 1701 Sisko, 1701 Bashir, etc.
He's the new #3 DIP base, and the #1 DIP/ENG shuttle. So ya, he'd be a nice addition for many.
here here!
Proud member of Patterns of Force
Captain Level 99
Played since January 2017
TP: Do better!!!
Skirmish in two weeks.
Maybe a collection soon?
By which time maybe they can figure out a GOOD prefix for the name.....
Funnily enough, she'll be bumping Xindi Insectoid as the next DIP primary on my cite priorities.
Starport
That's how I remember her from the old CCG, if nothing else.
Sounds good, but I would very much like a Samuel Clemens. I love Mark Twain books and short stories. I would work hard for that event.
**slams fist onto the table**
You all are really missing the obvious: I demand a 1* Data's Head!
We do have this 2* Data.
Phenomenal artwork. Big thumbs up.
"Under the Sea"
[cue steel drums]
The seaweed is always greener...
Not good enough!
I wish we could have that background art as a bridge crew background. Maybe as the reward for the second tier of a Time's Arrow collection.
XAC is a terrible voyager, imo. Doesn't even make the top 150 with my bonuses. Voyage traits are too few. The top 300 legendaries with 3 skills in terms of matching voyage traits have at least a 50% chance to match a trait. XAC is below 50%. Event potential seems fairly low.
Bottom line, I expect very little competition. If I join the fray, it will only be due to boredom.
I'm inclined to agree. SHe's also (almost definitely) event crew for a Skirmish event, which means I don't need her to rank well. As cool as it is that she's finally in the game, I don't need another 1/5 clogging up the works.
And DIP/ENG has a ton of great voyagers as well. Just limited to the top 100 you've got Adira Tal, Ishan Chaye, Bridge Officer #1, Stranded Quark, and Interfaced La Force - with extra support from Dexa, Zheng He Riker, EDF Adira, Red Angle, Maxwell Forrest, Amelia Earhart, and Laborer Kirk.
Starport
The naming bugs me, too. I am surprised they doubled-down on it after "Century Nurse Crusher". I just assumed it was supposed to be something like "19th Century..." but they realized they couldn't start a name with a number, couldn't get around it and just lopped it off at the last minute. But if they're doing it again maybe it was (mind-bogglingly) intentional? Or they made the same mistake twice.
LOL! I just last night watched the episode where Riker had to detach Data's head and hook it up to the computer so he could save the ship.
That is not what bugs me. What bugs me is that she is not a physician. Makes it a lil harder to use her in voyages and another physician would be greatly helpful to finishing the expanded physician collection. Nurse makes sense for the episode but physician would be helpful. She was after all a physician in disguise as a nurse.