Winter's Price: Save the Captain or save the prisoner?
Ironagedave
✭✭✭✭✭
in The Bridge
An away team found a crashed Arkonian shuttle on a snow-bound planet. The only survivors were the captain and a ragged prisoner in the brig, who's ship's records indicate has been accused of murder. Both are hypothermic and the away team only has enough thermal blankets to resucitate one.
Which one do you save and please feel free to use your reasoning in the comments below
Which one do you save and please feel free to use your reasoning in the comments below
[was on Sabbatical/Hiatus] Currently a trialist at Galaxy SquadronSTAY SAFE and KBO
Winter's Price: Save the Captain or save the prisoner? 83 votes
0
Comments
Cardassian wishlist:
Tora Ziyal - Thanks!
Natima Lang
Empok Nor Garak
Tekeny Ghemor
Mira
Makbar
Dejar
Ulani Belor
You've described my own reasoning so well that I don't have to type another word.
Also, you cannot save addicts; only they can choose to save themselves.
Side note: Starfleet's away teams are only equipped to save one person from hypothermia at a time? Couldn't even heat up some rocks with a phaser? Someone needs to teach them the 6 P's.
Edit: perhaps if the away team spent less time searching through the computer to satisfy their curiosity they might have more time to save both.
Kind of reminds me of the "The Enemy Within" episode
There is nothing to say he did - but equally basing the decision on who is more right or wrong may not be the moral or ethical decision to make.
1) The prisoner has not been found guilty, implies he is on his way to being tried, it would be a disservice to both party's representatives and it would not be Federation policy to play judge jury and executioner in this way.
In the Enterprise episode the Starfleet left on good terms with the Arkonians it would be in their interests to preserve this if possible, especially when there is an echo of doubt in guilt.
2) The captain was sworn to do a duty (to deliver contents/prisoner(s) safely to the designated destination), he can no longer perform this, your crew could fulfill that role instead. Being a captain has it's hazards and the captain would know there could be fatal consequences when tasked with this line of work.
Sorry if this is too Vulcan for people.
All you know for sure is that the captain crashed his ship. Oops, bad day for him, risk of the job. Prisoner was, in that moment, a victim of the captain's error.
One of the worst scenes that reflect this in a movie was in Titanic. That showed a non European non English family peering at deck map trying to read to understand what is happening around them. No one is helping them, and they cannot understand how to save themselves as ship sinks around them and chaos prevails.
Cameron is a great director and story teller
Edit: forgot some vital words!
The captain going down with his ship, is a very valid point. This means the captain is the last to be saved.
So if you can only save one, it has to be the prisoner. Even if everyone knows he is guilty.
The captain knows the risk of piloting a ship. Every time he pilots a ship he knows there is a chance that he will die.
Of course, we all know we need to reprogram this so we can save both.
Or for Dralix, reprogram it so we can get the reward for saving none, since as he mentions neither actually exist.
Fair. Still cold, but fair.
*It could be because I'm also a dirty socialist who must always do the politically expedient thing.
You have to save the prisoner to get the best Reward from the next linked mission.