Sigh, so they added a "non-original" to the "originals" collection, and of course, its done 1 day AFTER I use a citation to finish off the collection. I guess no one at TP saw this episode.......
Founding ADM - PoF family of fleets (POF, POF2 & POF3) - Dear TP: Non sequitur. Your facts are uncoordinated.
I can get behind Alicia’s stats. Would have expected a different order but it’s not entirely unreasonable as it is.
The Figure, however...meh. He’s basically another Scrooge Data but without the future event potential (even if he’s an Archer variant, that’s not saying much). And with the Faction event coming so early, I don’t see much need to cite him. If he drops from a recap pack, great! If not, I still have that saved citation to finish him and put him or someone else in the freezer.
The Figure, however...meh. He’s basically another Scrooge Data but without the future event potential (even if he’s an Archer variant, that’s not saying much). And with the Faction event coming so early, I don’t see much need to cite him. If he drops from a recap pack, great! If not, I still have that saved citation to finish him and put him or someone else in the freezer.
I was wondering about that, so the closest crew stat wise to Future Guy is Scrooge?
The Figure, however...meh. He’s basically another Scrooge Data but without the future event potential (even if he’s an Archer variant, that’s not saying much). And with the Faction event coming so early, I don’t see much need to cite him. If he drops from a recap pack, great! If not, I still have that saved citation to finish him and put him or someone else in the freezer.
I was wondering about that, so the closest crew stat wise to Future Guy is Scrooge?
I can get behind Alicia’s stats. Would have expected a different order but it’s not entirely unreasonable as it is.
The Figure, however...meh. He’s basically another Scrooge Data but without the future event potential (even if he’s an Archer variant, that’s not saying much). And with the Faction event coming so early, I don’t see much need to cite him. If he drops from a recap pack, great! If not, I still have that saved citation to finish him and put him or someone else in the freezer.
The first recurring mega with DIP primary and 3 stats and people find a way to complain. He could be the top DIP base and combined for a lot of people.
Honestly, I would put him far behind Scrooge and Sato for those of us more tenured players. Although technically similar in terms of Voyage potential, they're both main cast and Sato has that insane DIP base that puts all others to shame. I believe Scrooge has better traits for Voyages, but I won't swear by that.
Personally, since I have both immortalized, I'm thinking I'll divert that citation to someone else. But he's definitely not a bad crew by any means for newer players.
Honestly, I would put him far behind Scrooge and Sato for those of us more tenured players. Although technically similar in terms of Voyage potential, they're both main cast and Sato has that insane DIP base that puts all others to shame. I believe Scrooge has better traits for Voyages, but I won't swear by that.
Personally, since I have both immortalized, I'm thinking I'll divert that citation to someone else. But he's definitely not a bad crew by any means for newer players.
But where Future Guy gets a huge bonus is that you can get a 4/5 of him just by playing events.
I can get behind Alicia’s stats. Would have expected a different order but it’s not entirely unreasonable as it is.
The Figure, however...meh. He’s basically another Scrooge Data but without the future event potential (even if he’s an Archer variant, that’s not saying much). And with the Faction event coming so early, I don’t see much need to cite him. If he drops from a recap pack, great! If not, I still have that saved citation to finish him and put him or someone else in the freezer.
The first recurring mega with DIP primary and 3 stats and people find a way to complain. He could be the top DIP base and combined for a lot of people.
You bring up a great point - I had forgotten about just how many megas we’ve had without a DIP primary. That alone is noteworthy. And just because he’s going to end up being merely okay for me doesn’t mean that new players, anyone who didn’t spring for the Scrooge Data campaign, or anyone looking to have some extra SCI on DIP/COM voyages aren’t going to really appreciate him. I’m glad he wasn’t a 2-skill crew, I’m glad he’s as strong as he is, and that a lot of people will be able to enjoy his contributions to their crews.
People don’t have to be constantly vomiting rainbows to appease you...surprising though it may seem, there is the possibility to have a reaction somewhere between utter joy and reaching for the torches and pitchforks. Being confused at how the skills are chosen based on what we saw on screen, not having a real burning need for him on my crew, or being disappointed that we once again lost out on a reasonable opportunity to have a rare skill set (that everyone would appreciate) is okay, you know.
@Shan I don't know if it has been mentioned yet, but you list EV Phlox as existing in the Starfleet Communications board. I'm pretty sure that he is new...
Humanoid Figure is also listed as existing. Did I miss a week?
The Guardians of Tomorrow Protecting the Galaxy's Future from itself
The Figure, however...meh. He’s basically another Scrooge Data but without the future event potential (even if he’s an Archer variant, that’s not saying much). And with the Faction event coming so early, I don’t see much need to cite him. If he drops from a recap pack, great! If not, I still have that saved citation to finish him and put him or someone else in the freezer.
I was wondering about that, so the closest crew stat wise to Future Guy is Scrooge?
Or Professor Sato.
I currently have neither......
"The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself."
Honestly, I would put him far behind Scrooge and Sato for those of us more tenured players. Although technically similar in terms of Voyage potential, they're both main cast and Sato has that insane DIP base that puts all others to shame. I believe Scrooge has better traits for Voyages, but I won't swear by that.
Personally, since I have both immortalized, I'm thinking I'll divert that citation to someone else. But he's definitely not a bad crew by any means for newer players.
I, for instance, have zero of the other nine, and I've been playing a good few weeks.......
"The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself."
Honestly, I would put him far behind Scrooge and Sato for those of us more tenured players. Although technically similar in terms of Voyage potential, they're both main cast and Sato has that insane DIP base that puts all others to shame. I believe Scrooge has better traits for Voyages, but I won't swear by that.
Personally, since I have both immortalized, I'm thinking I'll divert that citation to someone else. But he's definitely not a bad crew by any means for newer players.
I, for instance, have zero of the other nine, and I've been playing a good few weeks.......
I can't believe you haven't thrown citations at holodeck enthusiasts to get Lucille Davenport. Please get to work on that.
Honestly, I would put him far behind Scrooge and Sato for those of us more tenured players. Although technically similar in terms of Voyage potential, they're both main cast and Sato has that insane DIP base that puts all others to shame. I believe Scrooge has better traits for Voyages, but I won't swear by that.
Personally, since I have both immortalized, I'm thinking I'll divert that citation to someone else. But he's definitely not a bad crew by any means for newer players.
I, for instance, have zero of the other nine, and I've been playing a good few weeks.......
I can't believe you haven't thrown citations at holodeck enthusiasts to get Lucille Davenport. Please get to work on that.
I've done that, and will again, my copy is only 4/5!
Honestly, I would put him far behind Scrooge and Sato for those of us more tenured players. Although technically similar in terms of Voyage potential, they're both main cast and Sato has that insane DIP base that puts all others to shame. I believe Scrooge has better traits for Voyages, but I won't swear by that.
Personally, since I have both immortalized, I'm thinking I'll divert that citation to someone else. But he's definitely not a bad crew by any means for newer players.
I, for instance, have zero of the other nine, and I've been playing a good few weeks.......
I can't believe you haven't thrown citations at holodeck enthusiasts to get Lucille Davenport. Please get to work on that.
I need to!!!!!
🖖🏿🖖🏾🖖🏽🖖🏼🖖🏻🖖
"The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself."
Hey all, EV Suit Phlox being part of the STT originals collection was a mistake and it will be corrected with next week's server. I will prepare a more formal message as well.
I am a little late on the death of Trip.
I made this comment way back on another post.
The final episode of Enterprise was a holographic history.
All the other episodes, we watch as they take place.
This one is not being seen by us as it actually occurred.
There is no reason to think that Tucker did die.
If they really did kill Trip. They did not have to include Riker and make it a Holoprogram. They could have just did it, as every other episode, and give it to us as it actually is occurring.
So, if you enhance a picture of the 'Humanoid Figure' it is clearly archer in a suit, with the "shadow" turned way up. Is the Humanoid Figure going to count as an archer variant?
So, if you enhance a picture of the 'Humanoid Figure' it is clearly archer in a suit, with the "shadow" turned way up. Is the Humanoid Figure going to count as an archer variant?
So, if you enhance a picture of the 'Humanoid Figure' it is clearly archer in a suit, with the "shadow" turned way up. Is the Humanoid Figure going to count as an archer variant?
It suddenly all makes sense...
Like I said, he had to fix the timeline........
"The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself."
I think it was just laziness on their part, not an Archer connection.
Yeah, sure. In the past they were always accused of not giving Enterprise and especially Archer enough credit. And now their "laziness" involves Archer of all persons. Like always you give the creators of this game way too less credit. Maybe around Christmas even your heart will soften a little and you say something nice about TP for a change
I think it was just laziness on their part, not an Archer connection.
Drawing an outline of a fake person is easier than making a real person and then darkening them to be nearly hidden. This was an intentional choice. Whether it's just a nod to the rumors of the plans for future guy, or they plan to reveal him as Archer in the mega finale we'll have to see.
Comments
The Figure, however...meh. He’s basically another Scrooge Data but without the future event potential (even if he’s an Archer variant, that’s not saying much). And with the Faction event coming so early, I don’t see much need to cite him. If he drops from a recap pack, great! If not, I still have that saved citation to finish him and put him or someone else in the freezer.
I warned you guys! I should finish my EV Tuvok, my last 3*, today.
I was wondering about that, so the closest crew stat wise to Future Guy is Scrooge?
Or Professor Sato.
The first recurring mega with DIP primary and 3 stats and people find a way to complain. He could be the top DIP base and combined for a lot of people.
Personally, since I have both immortalized, I'm thinking I'll divert that citation to someone else. But he's definitely not a bad crew by any means for newer players.
But where Future Guy gets a huge bonus is that you can get a 4/5 of him just by playing events.
You bring up a great point - I had forgotten about just how many megas we’ve had without a DIP primary. That alone is noteworthy. And just because he’s going to end up being merely okay for me doesn’t mean that new players, anyone who didn’t spring for the Scrooge Data campaign, or anyone looking to have some extra SCI on DIP/COM voyages aren’t going to really appreciate him. I’m glad he wasn’t a 2-skill crew, I’m glad he’s as strong as he is, and that a lot of people will be able to enjoy his contributions to their crews.
People don’t have to be constantly vomiting rainbows to appease you...surprising though it may seem, there is the possibility to have a reaction somewhere between utter joy and reaching for the torches and pitchforks. Being confused at how the skills are chosen based on what we saw on screen, not having a real burning need for him on my crew, or being disappointed that we once again lost out on a reasonable opportunity to have a rare skill set (that everyone would appreciate) is okay, you know.
Humanoid Figure is also listed as existing. Did I miss a week?
Protecting the Galaxy's Future from itself
I currently have neither......
I, for instance, have zero of the other nine, and I've been playing a good few weeks.......
I can't believe you haven't thrown citations at holodeck enthusiasts to get Lucille Davenport. Please get to work on that.
I've done that, and will again, my copy is only 4/5!
I need to!!!!!
🖖🏿🖖🏾🖖🏽🖖🏼🖖🏻🖖
Presumably the new 3* Trip too.
The list will be amended each week, yes.
I made this comment way back on another post.
The final episode of Enterprise was a holographic history.
All the other episodes, we watch as they take place.
This one is not being seen by us as it actually occurred.
There is no reason to think that Tucker did die.
If they really did kill Trip. They did not have to include Riker and make it a Holoprogram. They could have just did it, as every other episode, and give it to us as it actually is occurring.
It's got to be at least a picture of archer.
It suddenly all makes sense...
Like I said, he had to fix the timeline........
Yeah, sure. In the past they were always accused of not giving Enterprise and especially Archer enough credit. And now their "laziness" involves Archer of all persons. Like always you give the creators of this game way too less credit. Maybe around Christmas even your heart will soften a little and you say something nice about TP for a change
Drawing an outline of a fake person is easier than making a real person and then darkening them to be nearly hidden. This was an intentional choice. Whether it's just a nod to the rumors of the plans for future guy, or they plan to reveal him as Archer in the mega finale we'll have to see.